Search This Blog

Wednesday, April 18, 2007

Searching for Experience

This morning I was driving to work meditating on Johnny Cash/U2's song the Wanderer. I don't know if the song is meant to be overarchingly religious or if they simply use religious imagry. But even if it is not itself religious the imagry says a lot about the modern conception of religion in America, even if some of the comentators are right and he is talking about cold war Russia. Lets look at this one section.
I went out there
In search of experience
To taste and to touch
And to feel as much
As a man can Before he repents

This section is spoken (even differently that most of Cash' stuff is like it is spoken. This section underscores the carnality of human desire. On a top layer he is talking about food in the line, "to taste and to touch." I think we can relate this interpersonally as well, not only with sex, but also with desire. The singer leaves and wanders searching seeking to find as many experiences as he can, maybe to "get them under his belt," before he decides to change, before he repents.

I often wonder (wander) myself looking for experience, looking for life, a way to understand it in its fullness, its joys and pains, its happiness and suffering. And often catch myself thinking, "I can do this now, but when I am older and more settled I will have to think differently." What have we done to our religion that says, all fun must come before repentence, all fun must come as a youth so that in old age we can live more uprightly. I wonder if Jesus would want Christianity the way we understand it in the west. A Christianity where one spends all his time trying to stay pure, well maybe, but maybe Jesus would tell us we don't really understand purity.
See, I don't want to, "sin that grace may abound," but I also don't want to use my religion as an excuse to make my lack of experience and regret okay. CS Lewis contended we ourselves don't understand what being a Christian is. He seemed to think we have turned the word into a synonym for good, "Wow, that guy must be a Christian he is so nice." The culture has identified ethics and whatnot that align with concepts of right and wrong, good and bad, and many people choose to call those ethics Christian. They are similar ethics to that of the prechristian philosophers like Socraties, Plato, and Pathagoras. I would never say a Christian should ignore morality, and I would never say morality isn't normative, but I would say that in trying to keep othres from sin we have also crucified our freedom in Christ. For those of you who know me this harkens back to my philosophy of the use of language, but I think of this much more broadly, when I ask the question, not necissarily who is my brother, but who is my weaker brother. some of my weaker brothers are weaker so they can be manipulative and get their way. One author called it the "proffesional weaker brother."

Experience something today, taste, touch, feeling... even if you have already repented. These don't have to be bad things.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

"I would never say a Christian should ignore morality, and I would never say morality isn't normative, but I would say that in trying to keep others from sin we have laso crucified our freedom in Christ."

Freedom is such a hard concept for Americans. For most of America, "freedom" is synonymous with "license." But true freedom is not freedom FROM, as in freedom from you telling me what I can and cannot do, freedom to do whatever I please as long as it doesn't hurt anyone else, etc. No, true freedom is more like freedom FOR, as in I'm free, therefore I can use my freedom to love others, therefore I can use my freedom for worshipping God, therefore I can use my freedom for working in the cause of justice for the marginalized.

Yes, often Christian morality becomes a list of prohibitions and prescriptions. And many people chafe under such laundry lists of do's and don'ts. They're chafing because they've got the cart before the horse. They don't have what must precede the moral code.

The only way the moral code makes sense is IN relationship with the One who made us in his image and likeness, the One who loves so much that he does not hold back even his own Son. When a person is in that relationship, a relationship of love, a relationship of exchange of person, then the heart deeply desires that the person's actions be more and more in conformity with the image and likeness that is more and more coming into clearer focus.

The desire to love as God loves because we desire to love God draws us naturally into the moral life. But the moral code does not make sense on its own outside of that relationship. Outside that relationship, moral codes are an imposition which get in the way of me pursuing my happiness.

There is some wisdom in the strategy of many Christian groups in insisting on the personal relationship with Jesus being the only thing that matters. Maybe it's not the only thing, but it is perhaps the first thing.

Jason said...

Great thoughts, Justin. I would like to delve into the freedom definition as Dennis did, but I must pass. On the goodness of experience, see Ecclesiastes. Everything is an enigma, so just obey God and enjoy life, really experiencing it as it comes.